Ir al contenido principal

Blog Assignment #5

At a time like this in which freedom of speech is in jeopardy regarding various issues (some of which have been discussed in this blog), journalism has had the hard task of holding on together and avoid crumbling in the face of the government and social pressure. It has always held a crucial, yet troubling position throughout history because it was written by people - who are trying to get a point worth discussing -  to other people. Their argument can vary greatly from a passive article about an upcoming event to a roaring discussion about a recent political decision. Even so, writhin journalism, there are so many people that hold different opinions on the same subject. We can’t help it as human beings to have an opinion and acting upon it; this is what the French Revolution and  the Universal Declaration of Human Rights fight for. Besides freedom of speech and having an opinion, they also advocate for education. One is starting to believe that education is a social issue on many countries on purpose just so the government can take advantage of their citizen’s naivenesss and ignorance. We are not cattle, but it sure feels like we are being treated like cattle. The reason of why there are so many misleading news out there is because someone out there is bidding on this naive mess (or is completely misinformed of the situation at hand) whenever they write news articles. Education and consciousness isn’t something that can be gambled with, people deserve what is going on around them and be able to understand it.

We are usually inclined to stick around people that think similarly to the way we think. This is because the mind wants to build an environment in which it can be comfortable. This implies that it will be accepted and supported the way it already is. The harsh social and political environment has forced us to seek others who understand us, people that can assure us we are not wrong (or going crazy) with their presence. This may have been Buzzfeed’s case. Given the rise of the Republican Party to power, they felt as a means of communication this was a call to action and grew both in staff and as a community. Honestly, eventhough I agree with their point of view I still believe they are clickbait.  Nevertheless, their case can be compared to that of newspapers that are switching their distribution method from hard copy to online. It’s easier to reach people outside of their physical boundaries and strong communities are also built there. Let’s recall BuzzFeed operates solely online and they have no sign of stopping. The tide they are riding is the digital one, as with everything else that is moving to digital and there is nothing wrong with that as long as we know where to look.

Comentarios

Entradas más populares de este blog

Blog Assignment 9

Being well informed is becoming more of an ordeal in a world with so much false information in it. I am not referrng exclusively to the combination words “fake news” - which has become very popular with the rise of president Donald J. Trump to power -; misleading information can be found everywhere, even on medical reports and findings. This is a very important area in civilian life becuase it deals with our well-being quite literally; and if our health is compromised, it’s repercussions affect other aspects of our lives as well. The availability of eHealth to more and more people makes it easier for them to seek medical attention when needed, but we often encounter the question of where to look. The right information and the right physician are out there in the web; but sometimes we may be too desperate to tell apart a well-known doctor in the field from Jerry, who just knows way too much about methamphetamines. Most - if not all - the time, this distinction is crucial when reaching...

Blog Assignment 7

The recent rise in technology has lead people to believe that traditional methods or implements are unfit to carry out a task or supply the demand of pretty much anything; in other words, believe they are useless. However, in some cases, this isn’t true. When it comes to books, there is still a considerable amount of people who prefer and trust print copies rather their eBook counterpart. This percentage of people includes millennials as well. *sarcastic tone* I know, shocking. There are many reasons for this, among them trust and style. Personally, I don’t mind the format - in which the book I need/want is in - as long as I have it. I usually go for the most convenient way of acquiring them, which is eBook. Yes, some people prefer hard copies because they like how it feels an smells; and I have to admit it is a very pleasant sensation. However, hard copies can’t be read in the dark at three in the morning when I need to study (I mean...err...review) for a test or when I have been go...

Blog Assignment #3

Our rights end when those of others start. In India, the government is currently discussing if whether it should intervene or not with the “grossly offensive” or otherwise indecent user interactions in a communication service that may take place inside their borders. At first, I thought this article wanted to limit freedom of speech in another context. As in publishing defamatory allegations against the country or its government, or spreading controversial information about upcoming protocols or policies; in other words, I thought the section 66A of the Information Technology Act was an effort to censor the press. Soon enough, after two paragraphs and a half, it was clear that this document wanted to get rid of the offensive messages that could circulate in a communication service. As for any other discussion, there are certain grey areas that need to be clarified before reaching a veredict. As you may be able to tell, freedom of speech holds a dubious position in this Act. ...