Ir al contenido principal

Blog Assignment 9

Being well informed is becoming more of an ordeal in a world with so much false information in it. I am not referrng exclusively to the combination words “fake news” - which has become very popular with the rise of president Donald J. Trump to power -; misleading information can be found everywhere, even on medical reports and findings. This is a very important area in civilian life becuase it deals with our well-being quite literally; and if our health is compromised, it’s repercussions affect other aspects of our lives as well. The availability of eHealth to more and more people makes it easier for them to seek medical attention when needed, but we often encounter the question of where to look.

The right information and the right physician are out there in the web; but sometimes we may be too desperate to tell apart a well-known doctor in the field from Jerry, who just knows way too much about methamphetamines. Most - if not all - the time, this distinction is crucial when reaching a conclusion about the current state of our health; and it also determines how much your doctor is going to judge you when you tell them about your findings. For instance, I try to avoid sites that have a “.com” domain and wikis. It’s because ‘com’ is short for “commercial” and wikis are websites in which literally anyone can publish anything without limitations whatsoever. I don’t know about you, but I don’t want the medical information I need to be associated with those activities. Some of the most trustworthy sites have a “.org” or “.edu” domain - which stand for ‘organization’ and ‘education’, respectively - because it shows they have a designated purpose.

When you get to one of these sites, look for a name. It could be the the person running the website, the editing chief, the head doctor; you name it. The important thing is that this person must be researchable. You must be able to find this person on some other site or article besides the one you are already on. It adds to their credibility. Once you have identified this person, search for a copyright logo somewhere or search for the site itself in terms of reliability and looks for review. If the site in question seems legit to you, search for the same information elsewhere and compare it. Is it too different, too similar? You will never be too sure. At any rate, it is never too over-the-top to exercise your critical thinking skills; and remember that you can never be too informed

Comentarios

Entradas más populares de este blog

Blog Assignment 7

The recent rise in technology has lead people to believe that traditional methods or implements are unfit to carry out a task or supply the demand of pretty much anything; in other words, believe they are useless. However, in some cases, this isn’t true. When it comes to books, there is still a considerable amount of people who prefer and trust print copies rather their eBook counterpart. This percentage of people includes millennials as well. *sarcastic tone* I know, shocking. There are many reasons for this, among them trust and style. Personally, I don’t mind the format - in which the book I need/want is in - as long as I have it. I usually go for the most convenient way of acquiring them, which is eBook. Yes, some people prefer hard copies because they like how it feels an smells; and I have to admit it is a very pleasant sensation. However, hard copies can’t be read in the dark at three in the morning when I need to study (I mean...err...review) for a test or when I have been go...

Blog Assignment #3

Our rights end when those of others start. In India, the government is currently discussing if whether it should intervene or not with the “grossly offensive” or otherwise indecent user interactions in a communication service that may take place inside their borders. At first, I thought this article wanted to limit freedom of speech in another context. As in publishing defamatory allegations against the country or its government, or spreading controversial information about upcoming protocols or policies; in other words, I thought the section 66A of the Information Technology Act was an effort to censor the press. Soon enough, after two paragraphs and a half, it was clear that this document wanted to get rid of the offensive messages that could circulate in a communication service. As for any other discussion, there are certain grey areas that need to be clarified before reaching a veredict. As you may be able to tell, freedom of speech holds a dubious position in this Act. ...